Do Antler Restrictions Work?

Written by: Dick Henry

Do antler restrictions (3 point rule) really work? I have heard so many rumors
(and opinions) that it makes me confused. What’s the real deal?”
Antler Restriction

The short answer to your question is “yes” antler restrictions can and do work.  This has been proven time and again in many portions of white-tailed deer range in North America. In fact there are currently a total of 21 other states besides New York with white-tailed deer that currently have antler restriction programs implemented in their area of jurisdiction.

QDMA’s Philosophy Concerning Antler Restrictions

Protecting yearling bucks from premature harvest is a key component of “Herd Management” and is one of the four cornerstones of the Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA).  Herd Monitoring, Habitat Management and Hunter Management complete the four QDM building blocks.

On a nationwide scale, QDMA has and will support antler restriction programs if three specific and important criteria are met by the proponents of an antler restriction program.  Paramount to the endorsement of any yearling buck protection program, these three criteria must be met:

  • The proposed buck harvest standard must be biologically sound for the area and location being considered.
  • The majority of the affected hunters and landowners must support the proposed buck harvest standard.
  • There must be a commitment and a mechanism that allows comprehensive monitoring of the harvest at a level needed to determine success or failure of the proposed antler restriction program.

Old Standards Need Revising

3 Point RuleKeep in mind that the buck harvest standards in New York and many other northeastern states were implemented during the era of deer restoration almost 100 years ago. When the three-inch spike law was implemented in New York in 1912, deer were scarce, having been almost extirpated across the landscape as a result of habitat destruction and subsistence hunting. A key component of the deer restoration effort was the full and complete protection of female deer.  Since most firearms during that period had iron sights, it made sense to implement a doe protection statute that required bucks to have a three-inch antler. The common wisdom at that time was that a three-inch antler could be seen with the naked eye and allowed hunters to protect does from harvest.

The three-inch spike law worked extremely well. Deer populations were re-established across  NYS as habitat gradually returned. However, as the science of wildlife management also evolved in the last century, it became apparent that a buck with a three-inch spike is invariably a yearling deer, well short of its potential size. In terms of human development they are the biological equivalent of a 13-year-old boy, with considerable growth yet to occur before they reach maturity.

7 out of 10 Male Deer Killed in NYS are Immature

Fast-forward to 2010, and we now have a buck harvest in NYS that is comprised predominantly of immature males. In fact during the 2008 season, 7 out of 10 male deer killed in NYS were either fawns or yearlings. Currently only about two of every 100 male deer that are born in NY live long enough to reach four years of age. For lack of a better description, it is nothing more than  “100 years of tradition, unhampered by progress”.

Sportsmen in Ulster and Sullivan Counties realized this disparity and petitioned NYSDEC to implement a pilot antler restriction program in 2005 in two Wildlife Management Units in Ulster County. Adding two additional WMUs in Sullivan County in 2006 followed the initial effort.  Although progress has been slower than originally hoped for, protection of yearling bucks is occurring and continuous increases in the harvest of older bucks is evident.

The Future of Deer Hunting is in Danger

New York State DEC has been a leader in antlerless deer management since the inception of the “Party Permit” in the 1950′s. However in the arena of buck management there is a strong and steadfast philosophy of trying to manage the future by relying only on the past.  New York’s deer hunting program is undergoing a gradual and quiet, but very real crisis that does not bode well for the future. Hunter numbers have been in a slow but steady decline since the early 1990′s. The median hunter age continues to rise and the level of new hunter recruitment continues to be challenged by an evolving society that erodes the long held traditions of deer hunting. As hunters slowly but steadily age, individual participation invariably declines.  The current success rates of regular big game hunters hovers around 15%, one of the lowest levels of success among states with viable white-tailed deer populations. As noted previously, almost 70% of the male deer taken each year in NYS are fawns and yearlings. For an animal that does not reach it’s prime physical condition until about five years of age, this consistent annual harvest of immature males should be cause for concern among hunters who pay a premium price to pursue a magnificent resource.

Antler Restriction is Not About “ Rack Hunting”

Many critics of antler restrictions decry the practice as “trophy hunting”, “rack hunting” or “elitism”. Such statements are a gross oversimplification and generalization of a common misperception.

As noted previously in this article, QDMA strives to embrace four basic principles including overall herd management that seeks to attain a more natural balance of the age and sex structure of the deer herd on a landscape scale. The current buck management program in New York State is one of default, retained from an era when little knowledge of deer biology existed.

Among the other constraints that limit the success of antler restrictions in New York is the growing phenomena of land subdivision, fragmentation and intense human land use that ultimately restricts hunter access. This increasing level of development, along with burgeoning growth of suburbia results in increasing “no hunting”signs and de facto refuges for deer.

Hunting Mature Bucks is Enjoyable !

Very few NY hunters experience the luxury of having a significant number of mature bucks in their local deer population. An age structure with a greater number of mature bucks significantly enhances many of the satisfactions hunters derive from their deer hunting activities. Research has shown that yearling bucks make only a fraction of the rubs and scrapes that older deer commonly do. Signpost behaviors are an important facet of white-tailed deer breeding behavior and ecology, and seeing deer “sign”is a key hunter satisfaction in NYS.  Current regulations create a male deer population comprised predominantly of immature males that lack the courtship and breeding behaviors typically found in well-balanced deer herd.

What about meat hunters ?

Reliable records shown that there is significantly more usable meat on a mature buck than is found on a yearling buck.  A 2 ½ year old buck will have about an average of 57 pounds of boned meat, while a 3 ½ year old will have 66 pounds.  Compare these amounts of boned meat to a typical yearling buck that produces only about 40 pounds of boned meat.   With current success rates hovering around 15 % for regular big game license hunters, meat is at a premium for most hunters. Mature bucks invariably have a much greater load of meat standing beneath its antlers.

Let’s not overlook another great but underutilized source of venison.  Deer Management Permits (DMPs) are widely available in most Southern Zone WMUs, and for those who do not have one there is a liberal ability to receive and use the DMPs. Consignment or transfer of DMPs to other hunters has existed since 2002. Additionally separate season tags also exist to allow antlerless deer harvest in muzzloader and archery reasons. With all of these license and season options available, a NY hunter can theoretically harvest up to seven deer in a season.

There’s more than one way to bring home deer meat !

Loss of Choice ?

Probably the strongest impediment to the success of antler restrictions in New York is the 100 year old, longstanding Northeast deer hunting tradition of harvesting juvenile bucks. Opponents of antler restrictions are quick to cite their “loss of choice” to harvest any buck with a visible three inch antler. Sportsmen have traditionally supported bag limits in terms of size and numbers of fish and game taken. Long standing bag limits and size limits based upon sound biology and equitable distribution of a public resource is a key founding principle of wildlife management. Hunters and anglers readily accept these reasonable standards for many other species that are sought, and it should hold equally true for buck hunting in the Empire State.

In the long term, hunters are not losing the resource by passing on 1 ½ year old bucks. Studies in Pennsylvania show that 90% of the bucks that survive their yearling fall will survive to subsequent years. All things considered, hunting is the primary mortality factor for deer.  Dead deer don’t grow, therefore passing yearling bucks is in essence “banking” them for a better choice in future years.

Common Sense?

There is no biological basis or justification to continue to cull the majority of bucks as yearlings in NYS.  However, changes to longstanding traditions and closely held family customs are understandably slow to occur.

New York State’s three-inch spike law originated in an era of chamber pots and outhouses and we have learned much about the biology and ecology of white-tailed deer since the law was adopted in 1912.  There is a long list of obvious and valid reasons why the NFL doesn’t draft 13-year-old junior high football players. Many of those same reasons could also apply to white-tailed deer hunting and they make a compelling case for protecting yearling bucks.

To maintain the status quo, to do nothing, is to guarantee the continued slow, silent demise of deer hunting in New York, as we know it today.  We owe future generations of deer hunters a better legacy than a 100-year tradition that defies science and ignores common sense.

8 Comments

  1. David says:

    Great article clearly written by an expert. Protecting yearling bucks is clear common sense that is strongly supported by the majority to super majority of NY hunters. I suggest we all send this article off to our local DEC biologist and to the powers that be at the DEC.

    This is the future of buck management. How many more years of hunting are we going to lose waiting for progress?

  2. Ryan Trapani says:

    From a forestry standpoint, there are other significant amendments in our state’s constitution that were written over 100 years old, such as the Forest Preserve. Though it may have served some purpose at the time, it turns out that “forever” is an awful long time. We, in Delaware County are experiencing an extremely high harvest of yearling bucks, while at the same time are left with a landscape that includes a forest that is becoming quickly homogenouos. Deer populations as little as 4 – 7 per square mile are overbrowsing their environment and “eating themselves out of house and home.” In a forest that lacks diversity in canopy stratums (vertically) and species diversity (horizontally), few deer can make a great impact.

    It is crucial that on state lands that have the option for managing forests that this take place. Although the State of New York does not own most of the land, it is one of the largest landowners. More importantly, it serves as the role model for the public on how to best manage forest land. “Doing nothing” through fencing and forgetting in an outdated environmental tenet that should be overshadowed by hard conservation and management. Hopefully, the paradigm will shift.

  3. Administrator says:

    Thanks for the comment Ryan … sounds like you know what you are talking about!!! Keep coming back.

  4. John says:

    I wish some of this info would rub off on the Antler Restriction Haters on this thread: http://huntingny.com/forums/index.php/topic,108.0.html

    Great article. Thank you

  5. jeffrey says:

    Without antler restriction the current sucess rate is 15% with 7 out of 10 bucks harvested not meeting the criteria being proposed. So if we impelment antler restriction along with loss of hunting areas due to developement, we are looking at single digit % success rates thats a hard sell at 90 dollars a license and this is coming from someone who always has said if I have a choice between shooting a young buck or a doe I’am arrowing the doe. I have harvested several 6 pts 8pts 7pts. and several does over the past 20 yrs but when I look in the horn basket I have to admit theres a few spikes 3s and 4s n there to. One spike was my first bow kill and I feel just as proud and grateful as I do about the 240lb 8 pt rifle kill mounted on the wall. There were a few seasons without seeing any bone and prayng for a spike to walk by most hunters start the season with hopes of harvesting a mature knarly racked buck then reality sets in.

  6. Joe Servello says:

    Great to see the paragraph on natural age structure balance vs. rack hunting. Seems to be the one item that the nay sayers harp on the most is the trophy hunting issue when it comes to AR’s. More hunters need to understand age structure balance in the buck population here in NY… good jod

  7. steve says:

    Anyone who still enjoys slaughtering a buck with his very first set of antlers is a putz and should not adopt the honorable title of hunter. And the idea that I can just select myself if I want is lunacy. A young buck’s nervous system isn’t even mature enough for them to be wary. They’re children for goodness sake. I have had the experience of letting a dozen skippers walk and heard them get shot within 5 minutes by a putz. We’re not all lucky enough to have 1000 acres for QDM. We have to do it as a community. Just go hunt in PA or OH where they are way ahead of us in quality management and law enforcement. They get my tourist dollars. NY is lame.

  8. Ryan Trapani says:

    Hunters should stick together and refrain from name-calling (putz) of each other. This does not help any of us. I personally practice QDM and let the younger age class bucks go. However, it is something I believe in and practice voluntarily. Our culture is increasingly becoming a regulatory one, intolerant of other’s beliefs, goals, and objectives. Some hunters really do hunt for the meet. If they do not bow-hunt or muzzle-load and do not have a doe tag, then their only option during gun season is to take a buck (preferably the first that comes along). Their time may be limited because of work and other obligations further reducing their options leaving a small window for harvesting game meat. I whole-heartedly believe in QDM, but disagree with the antler restriction being a regulation since I also believe in the freedom to choose in not only hunting but other aspects of my life as well. I am fortunate to have a job that allows me the freedom to wait “for the big one” but others do not and we need to learn to be tolerant of others without using coercion from our tax dollars, law enforcement and each other.

Leave a Comment


Subscribe without commenting